This Is Telling: It’s Impossible to Imagine Donald Trump Giving the Gettysburg AddressNews at Home
tags: Abraham Lincoln, Gettysburg Address, democracy, Trump
Louis P. Masur, Distinguished Professor of American Studies and History at Rutgers University, is author of Lincoln’s Last Speech: Wartime Reconstruction and the Crisis of Reunion.
One hundred and fifty-five years ago, Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address, his paean to democracy. Donald Trump has compared himself to Lincoln and has stated falsely that Lincoln’s Address was universally panned at the time. But the differences between Lincoln and Trump couldn’t be starker. Lincoln came from a poor family, lived in a frontier cabin, and was self-educated; Trump comes from wealth, lived in a penthouse, and attended an Ivy League university. Lincoln opposed nativism; Trump champions it. Lincoln celebrated America’s global role, calling it “the last best hope of earth”; Trump seeks to withdraw from the world order, erect protective barriers, and place “America first.”
Perhaps the greatest difference between Lincoln and Trump concerns attitudes toward democracy. For Lincoln, democracy was everything and constituted the primary reason not to allow the nation to be destroyed; by comparison, for the past two years, Trump has waged war on democratic institutions.
Lincoln proclaimed his faith in democracy and the meaning of the Civil War on July 4, 1861, when he told Congress that the rebellion “presents to the whole family of man, the question, whether a constitutional republic, or a democracy—a government of the people by the same people—can or cannot, maintain its territorial integrity against its own domestic foes.” Should the rebellion succeed, it would “put an end to free government upon the earth.”
It galled him that a minority would resort to bullets rather than ballots in response to his election. There were many ways to contest an unfavorable political outcome—for example, organize and vote in future elections or call for a constitutional convention—but rebellion was not one of them. In 1864, with war raging and his reelection in doubt, Lincoln insisted that elections still be held. Consider that during World War II, Great Britain postponed general elections until the war was won and Lincoln’s actions seem even more remarkable. His commitment to democracy was unassailable. Following his victory, he declared “we cannot have free government without elections, and if the rebellion could force to forgo, or postpone, a national election, it might fairly claim to have already conquered and ruined us.”
Rather than encouraging democracy, Trump and today’s Republican party seem intent on curtailing it. Trump has denounced the media, used the Justice Department as his personal domain, and has continued to act autocratically. Rather than treat elections with reverence, he has falsely alleged fraud in Florida’s recent vote and opposed a recount. Republican politicians have made it harder, not easier, for Americans to vote. They have suppressed the vote of the poor and nonwhites by using a variety of tactics, including enacting voter identification laws, purging voters from the rolls, and reducing the number of polling places.
Some of this, of course, is politics as usual. Lincoln was no innocent and, in the election of 1864, he supported efforts to keep Democrats in the army from voting while promoting the votes of Republican soldiers in those states that allowed it. But Lincoln never wavered in his belief in democracy. Indeed, on April 11, 1865 he publicly endorsed the right to vote for black men who were educated and had served in the military. Hearing this, John Wilkes Booth became outraged and vowed it would be the last speech Lincoln ever gave. Three days later, he acted on his threat.
Lincoln offered his supreme tribute to democracy in the Gettysburg Address. The speech began by grounding the meaning of America in the Declaration of Independence and it ended by reaffirming that “government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” These past two years have rightly generated anxiety about the fate of democracy in America. As various observers have recently noted, a pro-democracy movement is blossoming. Preliminary numbers suggest that more than 49 per cent of eligible voters cast their ballots on election day, and some states surpassed 60%. This was the highest turnout for midterm elections in over 100 years.
Ballot measures that triumphed suggest citizens are fighting back. In Florida, voting rights were restored to over a million people with felony convictions and other states passed measures to simplify the registration process and reduce gerrymandering. There is talk of universal voting by mail and automatic voter registration. Thanks to the tireless efforts of those who are committed to the right to vote, democracy has a long way to go before it perishes. Lincoln would be pleased.
comments powered by Disqus
- The U.S. Deported a Million of Its Own Citizens to Mexico During the Great Depression
- Ted Cruz criticizes Tenn. governor for day honoring Confederate general and KKK leader
- Why Trump’s Census Play Is Blatantly Unconstitutional
- Japan, South Korea raise stakes in dispute over forced labor. History helps explain the conflict.
- The President Didn't Always Have Power Over Trade Deals
- A female historian wrote a book. Two male historians went on NPR to talk about it. They never mentioned her name. It’s Sarah Milov.
- Her Book in Limbo, Naomi Wolf Fights Back
- Louie Howland, editor and award-winning maritime historian, dies at 81
- ‘Uncharted Territory’: For Historians Navigating Online Hate, a Scholarly Association Offers a Map
- Smithsonian interested in obtaining migrant children's drawings depicting their time in US custody